A Return Ticket to Buckingham – Part 2; Peter Denny’s Modelling
When I was still in my shorts, I used to peruse my father’s extensive collection of railway magazines for hours on end – the Railway Modeller, Model Railway News and the Model Railway Constructor. I even marked in pen articles I particularly liked (not for long, the old man soon warned me off that approach!). My memories from this period of Buckingham were not about its operational possibilities but for its modelling.
Whilst the years have passed and there are now a fair number of fine layouts that have eclipsed Buckingham, back in the 1970s (when I was leafing through these magazines) these were not common and going back to when the articles were being written 10 or 15 years before, only a very few even got close to the standard of Peter’s modelling. So this post will illustrate what state of the art 1960s scenic modelling looked like.
As can be expected of a layout that is 50+ years old, wear is showing in places and prior to his death, Peter Denny did have a programme of repair and improvement underway. One of the aspects to be dealt with was the trees made of sprigs of lichen on trunks made of wire or heather – these had not faired well.
Tony had been mulling over what to do about this and consulted with Peter’s children who still have an interest in their father’s layout and seem to act as “non-exec directors” to the board. The conclusion was “do as Peter would have done” and as a result little upgrades and repairs are being completed to Buckingham, so the layout will still develop. In the case of the trees, replacements will be made of sea moss and ground foam.
One story that Tony was able to share with us, which I do not think is widely known, is why Peter selected the Great Central for his modelling. Apparently, he initially started modelling the Great Western but soon found that there were a few too many people that knew a too much about the GW. He was concerned any incorrect details would be found out and so he sought out a rather lesser known prototype. He settled on the GC because he wanted a prototype that had wooden post signals (he could not work out how to make lattice posts); he liked the brown and cream full coach livery that the GW & the GC shared and he did not want a company that used outside valve gear because he was concerned whether he could model it!
The layout contains a number of quite clever little cameos, often segregated from one another with a bridge or a blocking building. This means that there are quite a number of such scenes within close to each other without it looking too crowded.
Beyond the buffer stops of Buckingham, a market square and a pair of streets were modelled. Obviously, it is market day to generate a couple of extra trains – you can’t call this a cliche, because it was essentially the first example so every other example is the cliche!
In the final part, I will take a last look at the layout and also one of its more iconic features – the Automatic Crispen; with a shock horror revelation………..
Posted on January 2, 2017, in Buckingham Central, Uncategorized and tagged Buckingham Central, EM, GCR, Great Central Railway, Model Railway, Peter Denny, railway. Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.
I last saw the Market Square in Buckingham in 1953, but from memory this is an accurate portrayal.
I like that approach… model something with the least amount of ‘experts’ on the subject. Lol.
Marking magazines – I hope you have learnt since to refrain from being a ‘vandal’. Love Dad
Reblogged this on sed30's Blog and commented:
A fav layout of times past
It’s not only good that the layout is being maintained as the Rev. Denny would have done, but that his children want this too. Too many layouts simply decay when they are handed on.
Peter gave his reasons for modelling the GCR in his books, incidentally.
Thanks Simon, I did not know that Peter had explained his reasons for selecting the GCR before.
My second scope really will be new news though………………
I had many wonderful years visiting my grandfather and his model railway.